Issue # 66, 20-Jan-2004
ISSN 1447-4956
Copyright 2004 Jason Anderson. All rights
reserved worldwide
http://www.achievenetprofits.com/
IN THIS ISSUE
1. From the Editor
2. Interview - John Glube
3. Resources - Jay Abraham
Interview & Reports
4. Final Word
5. Legal Stuff
1. From the Editor
Welcome to another issue of Achieve Net
Profits. I hope this last week has been pleasant
for you, and you are making steady progress
towards your goals!
If you have been a reader for a while, you
might remember the name Ian Herculson. Over
several years he built up a list of over 18,000
people, only to lose it all when his web host
had "technical difficulties".
Rather than get upset about it, he turned
around and started rebuilding his list again.
Not only did he get over 2,000 people in the
first month, but his new list proved to be much
more responsive than his old one!
With his new focus on list building
techniques, Ian has come up with something
rather unique. It allows you to work with Ian to
build a list. He does all the work (publishing,
copywriting), while you do the promotion of the
list.
As I say, its a rather unique idea, and I
hope it catches on. At the very least have a
look so you can sign up for Ian's 12 part mini
course on how he rebuilt his list so
quickly.
http://www.achievenetprofits.com/smart
Speaking of lists, if you didn't have a look
at Dr.Mani's excellent product on how to build a
small but extremely profitable list that I
mentioned on Friday, there is still time to take
advantage of his generous $50 discount. Plus as
a special bonus from me, you will get a free 1
year membership to my membership site when it
launches next month.
But the bonus of the membership site access
will only be available for the next two days. So
if you're interested, I advise you to be
quick!
http://www.EzineMarketingCenter.com/anti/jasonanderson/
I hope you check both resources out.
Anyway, I don't have any "insightful"
comments this week about the world (I seem to be
suffering a minor case of writers block), so
rather than ramble on like I normally do, I'll
just tell you what's in this weeks
newsletter.
My interview this week is with John Glube.
John has been providing a fantastic service over
the last few months, writing articles that
translate all the "legal speak" the government
likes to come up with into simple language that
you and I can understand.
John's interview covers both the FTC
"crackdown" on online businesses that happened
in the middle of 2004, as well as the new spam
laws that are coming into effect in the US and
overseas.
The resource I have for you this week is an
audio interview and a number of reports from
someone you have probably heard of before - Jay
Abraham. Now to be honest, Jay is releasing this
material as a way to entice you to attend one of
his seminars, but they are still valuable
resources on their own. More on this below.
I hope you enjoy this weeks issue. And now,
on with the show!
2. Interview - John Glube
John Glube is an online
marketer, who happens to have a law degree and,
as he describes it, "some familiarity with the
legal system". He started online about a year
ago and "fell" into the niche of marketing
compliance in the summer of last year when he
wrote the report "Rules? What Rules?".
John also provides copywriting services,
and publishes an online e-zine titled 'Head's
Up, A Copywriter's Journal', which you can find
at http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/list.html.
Jason: Thanks for
taking the time to talk with me John. First of
all, how seriously should online business people
take these new laws (or more rigorous
enforcement of existing laws)? What about those
people who live in another country to the law in
question (e.g.: outside the US for FTC
regulations).
John: My pleasure Jason. Hopefully,
the answers I give will be of some value to your
readers.
The general thrust of the advertising rules
administered by the Commission represent in most
cases "good business" practices, so it makes
prudent business sense to understand and comply
with the guidelines outlined by the
Commission.
Why do I say this? Presently, the United
States represents the largest online market
place. Want to play in America? Common courtesy
dictates you abide by the rules.
Besides, most people who are doing business
online, even if they reside outside the United
States, have some connection with America. You
may be marketing to Americans, which means you
are likely going to be construed as doing
business in the United States.
The affiliate or network marketing program
you are marketing is based in the United States.
The web host or mail server you use is American,
or the payment processor or merchant service is
based in America.
Finally, people need to understand the United
States has entered into a series of arrangements
with other countries to facilitate dealing with
cross-border transactions. There is a fair
amount of co-operation between the various
authorities.
As an example of this go to http://www.econsumer.gov/english/index.html.
An American can now enter a complaint against an
Australian firm and the complaint is
automatically transmitted to the authorities in
the United States and Australia.
Just as there are some basic rules to the
road in the off line business world, the same
applies to the online community.
Some people were shocked with the actions
taken by the Commission in the spring of
2003.
Yet, the Commission made its position known
to the business community at large almost three
years prior. Many people felt the rules only
applied to large corporations. Despite repeated
warnings, the Commission ultimately felt
compelled to act.
The Commission in administering the rules
wants to make a point. Does this mean you can
fly under the radar and ignore the rules? No. It
means run a good business and act prudently.
Jason: What
documents should every business owner have on
their site, and what should these documents
cover?
John: As a business owner, you will
want to consider having:
A privacy policy. This will set out the basis
on how the business will handle information
collected from visitors and users of the
site.
A statement of terms of use. This is the core
document. It will set out the terms someone
agrees to in using the site and especially in
purchasing any products or services.
A disclaimer of legal warranties. This form
tells people any specific disclaimers of
warranties as contained in the terms of use.
An earnings disclaimer. This form in essence
tells visitors and prospective buyers don't rely
on our statements as to what earnings you may
make in using our products or services.
Some sites can roll these forms up into
shorter documents. Other sites may require a
full statement of rights, duties and
obligations. It simply depends on the objective
of the site.
Also, depending on the nature of your
business and how your web site is laid out, you
may need a specific statement when a person
subscribes to your newsletter.
Jason: Can you tell
us briefly about what rules apply to "free"
items that an owner may want to advertise on
their site, or give away as bonuses in their
sales letters?
John: Generally speaking, you cannot
market in a way that is deceptive or unfair.
There are some very specific rules concerning
marketing "free" items. A couple of quick
examples may help.
You place a value on a free item. How did you
come up with this value? No proof. The value you
select is deceptive and depending on the ad, a
material statement creating liability. Do you
intend to market this item separately in the
future? No. Then you cannot use the separate
value.
There are specific limits on how long you can
run a promotion and what you must do to comply.
You can't run a promotion longer than 6 months
in any given 12 month period.
For those who are interested, you can read
the relevant regulation issued by the Commission
at
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfrhtml_00/Title_16/16cfr251_0
0.html
Also, I have published a PDF booklet titled
"Rules? What Rules?" which people can access
through my site at http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/rulesintro.html.
In this booklet I take the reader through the
relevant regulations including those applying to
"free" items. Some have found this booklet quite
helpful.
Jason: When talking
about your own results with a particular product
(or method the product talks about), what things
do business owners have to make sure they do to
comply with the law?
John: Simply put, tell the truth, be
able to substantiate your statements and make
appropriate disclosure.
The Commission has put together some
excellent guides on the details and I take the
reader through these in my booklet, along with
providing relevant links.
Jason: Turning our
attention to mailing lists now. There has been a
lot of talk about requiring permission from
subscribers before a publisher can send them any
sort of ad. What steps should a publisher take
to ensure they get that permission and, more
importantly, can prove it?
John: This is a ticklish question. To
a certain extent, the answer depends on the
publisher's base of operations and the
publisher's market as there are variations
between the American, European Union and
Australian rules.
Also it depends on the type of publication
you are running.
Having reviewed the various rules, in essence
when someone subscribes to receive your online
publication, you want to provide some form of
statement as to what the person will
receive.
You can do this in a number of different
ways:
The statement can be included in the sales
copy for your newsletter.
You may wish to provide a formal statement
and ask the person to confirm agreement upon
subscribing.
The nature and form of the statement will
depend on the type of newsletter you are
running.
Jason: Could you
give us a few examples of what such a statement
might look like? Perhaps for a newsletter
selling ads (classifieds & solo), and for a
newsletter that doesn't sell advertising, but
still promotes other products?
John: Rather than give you examples,
let me direct you to two sites.
The first is my own. I don't sell advertising
space. If your readers go to http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/list.html
he or she will see how I have worked the
language into the sales copy just above the
subscribe box.
I have also included a specific statement. In
this case the statement is referenced beneath
the subscribe box and then found at the bottom
of the page.
Some might set up the specific statement
above the subscribe box. This particular list
requires a person to confirm upon subscribing. I
have two redirect pages and both pages repeat
the caution, being worked into the copy.
(Perhaps it is overdone.)
Given how the index page is set up, with a
link over to the subscribe page, having reviewed
the matter closely, I ultimately decided not to
ask my subscribers for the Journal to reconfirm?
Why? Because my subscriber base has been built
on the basis of express consent from the very
beginning. (Of course, when the Commission comes
out with its regulations and guidelines, who
knows, they might tell me I am full of it.)
I do run a smaller mailing list and I need to
ask this group of subscribers to reconfirm.
In fairness to your readers, opinion is
divergent on this issue. Some marketers, with
the removal of the threat of litigation from
California residents don't feel a disclaimer is
necessary. Personally, I think this is an error,
at least if you want to have "affirmative
consent," but each to his own.
The second example involves the sign up page
for Rim Digest eZine, published by Jan
Tallent-Dandridge. Jan sells advertising. You
will find the language on http://www.rimdigest.com/.
This is a more formal statement and you can see
how Jan has set up the process, so that she has
a record on file.
You could also use the subscribe box and have
a radio confirm button.
(As a side note, after the UK Information
Commissioner came out with his comments on
solicited versus unsolicited, notice how the
formal language on my page now reads.)
Review your proposed wording with a competent
adviser. Then make any necessary adjustments and
proceed. When a problem arises, talk with your
adviser as required and promptly deal with it.
Don't hide, run away, or avoid it.
Jason: What things
should every message you send to your list have
to ensure you're complying with the
law?
John: Jason, I have published a couple
of articles on compliance issues. If I may,
rather than run through a list, I am simply
going to reference these articles.
One caveat. I urge people to read and
understand the applicable legislation. In the
case of the Can Spam Act of 2003, although
Congress has passed the law, the Commission has
yet to issue the regulations. This leaves
certain areas open or "grey."
In running an online publication, remember as
a publisher you are running a business.
Read the legislation.
The Can Spam Act of 2003
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamus.html
UK Anti-Spam Regulations
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamuk.html
Review the informed commentaries.
I have published four articles. Three are
relevant to this discussion:
The Federal Regulators Are Coming To Town
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamga.html
The Guys And Gals In Blue Have Arrived
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamfr.html
The Commissioner's Guidance
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamukg.html
(People can access these online.)
Understand the commentaries, whoever has
written them, are just that - commentaries.
Keep in mind the underlying purpose of the
legislation.
Then act in a prudent fashion.
Keep the interests of your subscribers'
paramount, treating your subscribers with
respect.
Structure your affairs to minimize risk,
while focusing on running a "good" business,
delivering value and turning a profit.
Consider, depending on the size of your
business and the various assets at risk in
obtaining business risk insurance.
Review your plan with a competent adviser.
Make any necessary adjustments and then proceed.
When a problem arises, talk with your adviser as
needed and promptly deal with it. Don't hide,
run away, avoid it, etc.
After you have established your plan and are
proceeding in moving forward with your business,
monitor the situation to keep reasonably abreast
of developments and make any required
changes.
Jason: Thank you
for the list of resources! If someone receives
official notice from the FTC, etc that says they
are in breach of the law, in general terms what
should they do? Are there any organizations that
they could go to for advice?
John: When this happens you need to
speak with a licensed attorney and not merely a
marketing consultant like myself. If you don't
have an attorney and don't know how to select
one, you can turn to the local State bar for
guidance on how to select an attorney, or go to
the American Bar Association.
There are also various agencies you can turn
to, one known as Martindale and Hubble, which
provides a listing service with a rating
guide.
Jason: If a
publisher sends third party ads to their list,
what steps should they take to make sure they
comply with the law?
John: To be sure you are in
compliance, you want to satisfy yourself you
have "affirmative consent" as the American's
call it, or "direct consent" as the English
describe it from your subscribers.
Unless you built your list with this in mind,
as a publisher you are going to have to ask your
subscribers to reconfirm to ensure
compliance.
If you decide not to go through this process,
then you will want to have an opinion from a
competent advisor on file as to why this is not
necessary.
(I appreciate some business people think this
is extreme. Fine. However, the question was what
steps people need to take to make sure they
comply.)
Also, under the rules, to ensure compliance,
you are going to have to put in place a
suppression procedure.
A suppression list is a fancy term for a list
created to prevent you from sending material to
the people on this list.
In essence, under the rules when someone
makes a request to opt-out, you have to forward
this request to the advertiser. This can be done
in a number of different ways.
(Some have expressed concern this violates
the confidential relationship between the
publisher and the subscriber. The American
legislation deals with this concern to a degree
and the publisher can add additional
protections.)
This ensures both you as the publisher and
the advertiser don't send advertisements for the
advertiser to this particular subscriber in the
future.
You may want to provide a specific email
address or link for people to request to opt-out
from receiving further solo ads from the
particular advertiser, or to opt-out generally
from your publication.
The email address could forward the
information to the advertiser and the advertiser
could then forward the information to you.
Adjustments need to be made to existing list
server and auto responder services to meet these
regulatory requirements.
Jason: You've
mentioned "affirmative consent" and "direct
consent" several times. What's the difference
between the two? Is it possible to satisfy both
requirements easily?
John: "Affirmative consent" is the
term used in the American legislation and is
defined as follows:
"The term 'affirmative consent', when used
with respect to a commercial electronic mail
message, means that--
(A) the recipient expressly consented to
receive the message, either in response to a
clear and conspicuous request for such consent
or at the recipient's own initiative; and
(B) if the message is from a party other than
the party to which the recipient communicated
such consent, the recipient was given clear and
conspicuous notice at the time the consent was
communicated that the recipient's electronic
mail address could be transferred to such other
party for the purpose of initiating commercial
electronic mail messages."
(see section 3 (1) of the Act. You can read a
copy of the Act online at http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamus.html)
"Direct consent" is a term I have coined to
describe the requirement under the EU rules,
drawing a distinction between the pre-existing
business relationship exemption and consent. It
is a reminder under the UK regulations at least,
the message being sent is a direct marketing
message, as opposed to a commercial message.
Rent a list from a third party, co-generate
leads and so forth, the person has to
specifically agree to receive messages from
you.
The relevant section of the UK regulations
reads as follows:
"(1) This regulation applies to the
transmission of unsolicited communications by
means of electronic mail to individual
subscribers.
(2) Except in the circumstances referred to
in paragraph (3), a person shall neither
transmit, nor instigate the transmission of,
unsolicited communications for the purposes of
direct marketing by means of electronic mail
unless the recipient of the electronic mail has
previously notified the sender that he consents
for the time being to such communications being
sent by, or at the instigation of, the
sender.
(3) A person may send or instigate the
sending of electronic mail for the purposes of
direct marketing where -
(a) that person has obtained the
contact details of the recipient of that
electronic mail in the course of the sale or
negotiations for the sale of a product or
service to that recipient;
(b) the direct marketing is in respect of
that person's similar products and services
only; and
(c) the recipient has been given a simple
means of refusing (free of charge except for
the costs of the transmission of the refusal)
the use of his contact details for the
purposes of such direct marketing, at the
time that the details were initially
collected, and, where he did not initially
refuse the use of the details, at the time of
each subsequent communication."
(See section 22 of the UK Anti-spam
regulations. You can read a copy online at
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamukg.html)
There is a difference between the two
regimes. Under the EU rules, at least as
proclaimed in the UK, when a person gives you
"direct consent," a person is consenting to
receive unsolicited direct marketing
messages.
With "affirmative consent" the person is
soliciting receipt of the commercial message. To
some, consenting to receive an unsolicited
message means the message is a solicited
message.
However, if you read the UK regulation
closely and the definition of "affirmative
consent" in the Can Spam Act of 2003, the
distinction becomes clearer.
Still don't get it? Then you will want to
read the Commissioner's Guidance, which you can
find here:
http://www.learnsteps4profit.com/antispamukg.html
The United Kingdom Information Commissioner
notes the purpose of the UK regulations is to
allow people to send unsolicited direct
marketing messages with consent. To point out
the distinction between a solicited message and
consenting to receive an unsolicited message he
uses an analogy.
You go to a pub. A man turns to a woman and
asks her, "would you like a beer?" She says
"yes." The woman is consenting to receive an
unsolicited beer.
Same situation. The woman turns to the man
and says, "I would like a beer?" He says, "I
will get you one." The woman is soliciting a
beer.
Hopefully, this explains the difference. To
meet the requirement of both, you want your
subscribers to invite receipt of commercial
messages from you, by giving express
consent.
Understand what happens when a person goes to
subscribe to your e-zine or newsletter.
The person fills in a form and presses
submit. What is the person "initiating" to
receive - to put it in the lexicon of the
Act?
Well it depends what you say on your web
site.
You don't need to label your commercial
message with "affirmative consent." But, if you
don't have affirmative consent and don't label
the message, it is an unfair or deceptive trade
practice under the Act.
This is why some people are saying, rather
than put up a disclaimer, put a label on your
commercial messages and since the Act does not
require the label go in the subject line, put a
simple statement above your physical
address.
Fine, but what happens when the labelling
requirements are confirmed and you have to put
ADV in the subject line, meaning the filters are
now blocking your messages? Do you pay a fee and
become a trusted e-mail sender?
Or the "Do Not Spam Registry" becomes law and
since you don't necessarily have "affirmative
consent" you have to sign up, pay your fees and
strike off everyone from your list who does not
wish to receive unsolicited commercial
messages?
In part this goes to a matter of marketing
philosophy and approach.
The prudent course when marketing a "free"
e-zine is to include a statement on your web
site next to your subscribe box, telling people
in essence "this is what you are going to get."
Then the publisher knows the person upon
subscribing understood and initiated receipt,
giving the publisher "affirmative consent" and
making your commercial messages solicited.
In this way, when a "Do Not Spam Registry"
becomes part of the law of the land, the
labelling requirements are confirmed, or the law
is changed, you are protected.
(As a side note, becoming a trusted mail
sender may be a prudent course. However, this is
a discussion for a different day.)
Jason: What effect
(if any) will the new laws coming in have on
publishers who buy their subscribers from lead
selling companies? How about ad co-ops, and
other sources of subscribers?
John: You need to ensure the person
who is subscribing has given "affirmative
consent" under the American rules or "direct
consent" under the European rules.
In purchasing subscribers from co-generation
services, you want to know what the form
specifically states when a person signs up to
receive information about a specific subject. If
not done properly, you will have to go back and
reconfirm a person's willingness to receive
commercial messages.
(I review this issue in detail in the article
"The Guys And Gals In Blue Have Arrived.")
The same general principles apply to
generating leads from ad co-ops and other
sources of subscribers.
Jason: Do you feel
the new laws coming in (and more rigorous
enforcement of existing laws) will make it more
difficult for a new business owner to get
started in the future?
John: The short answer is no. Most of
the rules reflect good business practice.
Perhaps the biggest change? This is a business
and people need to treat it this way.
In the immediate future, there is concern
about the application of suppression rules to
affiliate and network marketing programs. This
may pose some difficulty and under the Can Spam
Act of 2003 remains an outstanding or grey
area.
The biggest question at present is how people
will adjust to the growing unreliability of
e-mail. This is a function of the various blocks
imposed to thwart spam and the general strain on
the infrastructure with the huge increase in the
volume of messages being transmitted.
This is why more and more marketers are
looking at off line marketing as well as online
marketing, which may mean the cost to start a
marketing business online will go up.
Jason: Finally, do
you have any predictions on what new laws we
might see in the future as far as the Internet
is concerned?
John: Over the next 2 years in the
sphere of e-mail marketing you will see three
major debates:
The labelling requirement for commercial
messages needs to be sorted out under the
American rules. Once settled, this will make it
relatively easy to block commercial messages.
True, if you have affirmative consent, you don't
have to label your message. However, publishers
will want to avoid all of the problems with
e-mail filters to enhance delivery rates. This
will mean greater reliance on trusted mailing
concepts, allowing the user to be "white
listed." At present, the requirement to be
treated as a trusted mailer is quite expensive
for a start up.
Also, marketers should start considering
other channels of distribution, including the
use of blogs with e-mail contact lists and real
simple syndication feeds, channelling through
the use of services like quikonnex (http://www.adcopy.quikonnex.com)
and email syndication services like
newsmons.(http://www.newsmons.com.)
Why do I make these suggestions? Studies are
indicating e-mail has lost its value
comparatively speaking as a medium for customer
acquisition and the best value of e-mail is
customer retention. Through the use of the
services I referenced you can enhance your
ability to acquire customers, using e-mail for
its primary purpose of staying in touch.
What steps need to be taken to bring the
illegal spam situation under control? To satisfy
certain groups, despite significant
reservations, the Commission may implement a Do
Not Spam registry.
The implementation of a "bounty hunter"
regime as called for under the American rules
will upset people.
Many commentators have suggested the American
rules won't work and will simply make the
problem worse.
In passing the law, Congress made it clear
this law is not a final solution.
Congress has asked the Commission to report
back in two years time on the effectiveness of
the legislation.
It is possible the present opt-out regime may
be set aside and Congress will move to an opt-in
regime with an outright ban on unsolicited
commercial messages. At the same time in Europe,
you need to see a strengthening of the
enforcement regime for the rules to truly
bite.
(As an aside, in my view, this is not
necessary if the Internet service providers were
to take control of the situation and enforce
their terms of service which ban the sending of
unsolicited commercial messages. To date the big
Internet service providers have straddled the
fence on this issue, complaining of abuse, while
allowing marketers to use their services to send
out unsolicited commercial e-mail.)
In addition, as the Internet does not respect
boundaries you will see more cases involving
claims of defamation concerning statements made
on public forums and even closer inter
governmental co-operation in dealing with
abusive practices.
The Internet is a great democratizer. Perhaps
the biggest concern for the micro and small
business owner is the establishment of regimes
that tend to squeeze out the micro business
owner and prevent people from getting into the
fray. Fortunately, despite how some may feel,
the Commission views the world this way as
well.
Jason: Thanks for
your superb insight John. I realize this is a
complex issue, and I thank you for taking the
time to explain it to us.
John: Your kind words are appreciated.
One final comment, although I have a law degree,
I am not a lawyer. The comments contained in
this interview are for people's information to
assist in sorting out "best practices," which is
an area were I feel comfortable. No legal
guidance is intended or given. If your readers
have a legal question, then talk with a
lawyer.
3. Resources - Jay Abraham
Interview & Reports
I'm sure you've heard the name Jay Abraham
before. If not, Jay is one of the top paid
marketing consultants in the world. He charges
clients $5,000 an hour (no, that's not a
misprint!), and his clients are happy to pay
that much once they see the results he brings
their business.
He's also one of the people that most of the
current Internet experts have learned from, at
least to some extent.
Jay has released a 40 minute interview that
he did (Real Audio only I'm afraid), which makes
for interesting listening. He covers a variety
of topics - putting the customer first, desire
vs commitment, and paying the business game by
their own "rules" to cover just a few.
http://www.abrahaminternetstrategies.com/home/15435/ram.ram
There is also a link (in the Real Player
window) where you can sign up to get a series of
reports from Jay. I've received the reports,
although I haven't looked and listened to the
material yet so I can't comment on how good they
are.
And just so you know, the audio & reports
have been released as a "teaser" for a seminar
Jay will be running soon. So the page where you
sign up for the reports will try to convince you
to attend.
But don't let that put you off - the audio
link above is still a good listen, and you can
safely ignore the seminar links (unless you
decide you want to go of course!)
This link has also been added to the "members
only" section, along with the existing
collection of ebooks, ecourses, and other useful
sites.
http://www.achievenetprofits.com/members/
[Subscribers-only area. The password
was sent out in the annoumcement message for
this issue. If you aren't a Subscriber, the
password is also in the Welcome message when you
subscribe to this newsletter!]
4. Final Word
You know, its amazing how much discomfort you
can get from a small part of your body.
The last couple of days I've had an ear
infection. It started off slowly near the end of
last week, then hit hard on the weekend, and now
seems to be slowly getting better (I know it's
still "there", but it isn't really hurting any
more).
But man, you sure can't concentrate too well
when your ear is hurting! :-)
I probably should have gone to the doctors to
get some antibiotics, but I'll confess that I'm
someone who doesn't like going to the doctors
unless I really have to. Besides, GPs don't
usually see patients on the weekend here in
Tasmania, so I had to wait until Monday anyway.
And by then it didn't seem worth it.
At least, that's what I'm trying to convince
myself ;-)
On the other hand, if it happens again I
think I'll just go straight to the doctor. I'm a
wimp when it comes to pain, and I don't want to
have to put up with it again!
Till next week take care, and may your
profits keep rising.
"You don't get to choose how you're going to
die, or when. You can only decide how you're
going to live. Now." -- Joan Baez
5. Legal Stuff
Copyright 2004 Jason Anderson. All rights
reserved.
We accept no responsibility whatsoever for
the content, profitability or legality of any
published articles or advertisements contained
within Achieve Net Profits.
And, although all of the articles have been
selected for their content, the publishing of
such articles within this newsletter does NOT
constitute a recommendation of the products or
services mentioned or advertised within those
articles.
Be responsible! Always do your own Due
Diligence before responding to any offer.
